O-RAN-SC: Operation and Maintenance (OAM)

Projects that follow the best practices below can voluntarily self-certify and show that they've achieved an Open Source Security Foundation (OpenSSF) best practices badge.

If this is your project, please show your badge status on your project page! The badge status looks like this: Badge level for project 4657 is passing Here is how to embed it:

These are the Passing level criteria. You can also view the Silver or Gold level criteria.

        

 Basics 13/13

  • Identification

    According to the O-RAN-SC-OAM-Architecture document all ManagedElements (near-real-time-RIC, O-CU-CP, O-CU-UP, O-DU and O-RU) implement the O1-interface.

    The O-RAN-OAM-interface specification defines

    a NetConf-Server for Configuration Management (CM) and a http-client for Fault Management (FM), Performance Management (PM) and other events on each Management-Service-Provider (MnS-Provider) running on the ManagedElement (ME).

    The O-RAN-SC-OAM project provides reference implementation according to the O-RAN OAM (WG1) documents. In addition we provide a common MnS-Consumer for development and module test purposes. The assumption is that the projects for the ManagedElements can concentrate on the more important user-plane.

    Of course each project needs its own OAM repo to address the specific needs of the ManagedElement.

    What programming language(s) are used to implement the project?
  • Basic project website content


    The project website MUST succinctly describe what the software does (what problem does it solve?). [description_good]

    Please see the scope of the O-RAN-SC OAM project: https://wiki.o-ran-sc.org/x/jwI3



    The project website MUST provide information on how to: obtain, provide feedback (as bug reports or enhancements), and contribute to the software. [interact]

    Please follow the links to LFN tool chain (Meeting, JIra, Confuence, gerrit, docs)



    The information on how to contribute MUST explain the contribution process (e.g., are pull requests used?) (URL required) [contribution]

    The information on how to contribute SHOULD include the requirements for acceptable contributions (e.g., a reference to any required coding standard). (URL required) [contribution_requirements]
  • FLOSS license

    What license(s) is the project released under?



    The software produced by the project MUST be released as FLOSS. [floss_license]

    The Apache-2.0 license is approved by the Open Source Initiative (OSI).



    It is SUGGESTED that any required license(s) for the software produced by the project be approved by the Open Source Initiative (OSI). [floss_license_osi]

    The Apache-2.0 license is approved by the Open Source Initiative (OSI).



    The project MUST post the license(s) of its results in a standard location in their source repository. (URL required) [license_location]

    https://gerrit.o-ran-sc.org/r/admin/repos/oam available in root of the repos.


  • Documentation


    The project MUST provide basic documentation for the software produced by the project. [documentation_basics]

    The project MUST provide reference documentation that describes the external interface (both input and output) of the software produced by the project. [documentation_interface]

    External interfaces are derived from yang models and "learned" on-the-fly.

    Please see O-RAN and 3GPP and IETF and ONF modeling pages.


  • Other


    The project sites (website, repository, and download URLs) MUST support HTTPS using TLS. [sites_https]

    Given only https: URLs.



    The project MUST have one or more mechanisms for discussion (including proposed changes and issues) that are searchable, allow messages and topics to be addressed by URL, enable new people to participate in some of the discussions, and do not require client-side installation of proprietary software. [discussion]

    Discussions are possible by Confluence, O-RAN meetings, O-RAN-SC meetings and email.



    The project SHOULD provide documentation in English and be able to accept bug reports and comments about code in English. [english]


    The project MUST be maintained. [maintained]


(Advanced) What other users have additional rights to edit this badge entry? Currently: [9774]



  • Public version-controlled source repository


    The project MUST have a version-controlled source repository that is publicly readable and has a URL. [repo_public]

    The project's source repository MUST track what changes were made, who made the changes, and when the changes were made. [repo_track]

    To enable collaborative review, the project's source repository MUST include interim versions for review between releases; it MUST NOT include only final releases. [repo_interim]


    It is SUGGESTED that common distributed version control software be used (e.g., git) for the project's source repository. [repo_distributed]
  • Unique version numbering


    The project results MUST have a unique version identifier for each release intended to be used by users. [version_unique]


    It is SUGGESTED that the Semantic Versioning (SemVer) or Calendar Versioning (CalVer) version numbering format be used for releases. It is SUGGESTED that those who use CalVer include a micro level value. [version_semver]


    It is SUGGESTED that projects identify each release within their version control system. For example, it is SUGGESTED that those using git identify each release using git tags. [version_tags]

  • Release notes


    The project MUST provide, in each release, release notes that are a human-readable summary of major changes in that release to help users determine if they should upgrade and what the upgrade impact will be. The release notes MUST NOT be the raw output of a version control log (e.g., the "git log" command results are not release notes). Projects whose results are not intended for reuse in multiple locations (such as the software for a single website or service) AND employ continuous delivery MAY select "N/A". (URL required) [release_notes]

    The release notes MUST identify every publicly known run-time vulnerability fixed in this release that already had a CVE assignment or similar when the release was created. This criterion may be marked as not applicable (N/A) if users typically cannot practically update the software themselves (e.g., as is often true for kernel updates). This criterion applies only to the project results, not to its dependencies. If there are no release notes or there have been no publicly known vulnerabilities, choose N/A. [release_notes_vulns]

    None identified so far.


  • Bug-reporting process


    The project MUST provide a process for users to submit bug reports (e.g., using an issue tracker or a mailing list). (URL required) [report_process]

    Please see

    JIra: jira.o-ran-sc.org/projects/OAM/issues OSC Guidelines: https://wiki.o-ran-sc.org/display/ORAN/Reporting+Bugs



    The project SHOULD use an issue tracker for tracking individual issues. [report_tracker]

    Please see

    jira.o-ran-sc.org/projects/OAM/issues



    The project MUST acknowledge a majority of bug reports submitted in the last 2-12 months (inclusive); the response need not include a fix. [report_responses]

    As can be seen on:

    Email List: OSC "discuss" mailing list: https://lists.o-ran-sc.org/g/discuss: discuss@lists.o-ran-sc.org Please use hashtag #oam JIRA: jira.o-ran-sc.org/projects/OAM/issues



    The project SHOULD respond to a majority (>50%) of enhancement requests in the last 2-12 months (inclusive). [enhancement_responses]

    As can be seen on:

    Email List: OSC "discuss" mailing list: https://lists.o-ran-sc.org/g/discuss: discuss@lists.o-ran-sc.org Please use hashtag #oam JIRA: jira.o-ran-sc.org/projects/OAM/issues



    The project MUST have a publicly available archive for reports and responses for later searching. (URL required) [report_archive]
  • Vulnerability report process


    The project MUST publish the process for reporting vulnerabilities on the project site. (URL required) [vulnerability_report_process]

    If private vulnerability reports are supported, the project MUST include how to send the information in a way that is kept private. (URL required) [vulnerability_report_private]

    The project's initial response time for any vulnerability report received in the last 6 months MUST be less than or equal to 14 days. [vulnerability_report_response]

  • Working build system


    If the software produced by the project requires building for use, the project MUST provide a working build system that can automatically rebuild the software from source code. [build]

    Docker



    It is SUGGESTED that common tools be used for building the software. [build_common_tools]

    Docker



    The project SHOULD be buildable using only FLOSS tools. [build_floss_tools]

    Docker


  • Automated test suite


    The project MUST use at least one automated test suite that is publicly released as FLOSS (this test suite may be maintained as a separate FLOSS project). The project MUST clearly show or document how to run the test suite(s) (e.g., via a continuous integration (CI) script or via documentation in files such as BUILD.md, README.md, or CONTRIBUTING.md). [test]

    Project uses jUnit to run automated unit tests. The unit tests can be found in sub-directories ./test

    Example: - https://gerrit.o-ran-sc.org/r/gitweb?p=oam/tr069-adapter.git;a=tree;f=mapper/src/test



    A test suite SHOULD be invocable in a standard way for that language. [test_invocation]

    maven scope test



    It is SUGGESTED that the test suite cover most (or ideally all) the code branches, input fields, and functionality. [test_most]

    All versions are tested in autotest suite (above)



    It is SUGGESTED that the project implement continuous integration (where new or changed code is frequently integrated into a central code repository and automated tests are run on the result). [test_continuous_integration]

    Multiple tests triggered automatically and periodically as Jenkins jobs at numerous phases of CI/CD pipeline - https://jenkins.o-ran-sc.org/view/oam-tr069-adapter/job/oam-tr069-adapter-maven-docker-verify-master-mvn36-openjdk8/


  • New functionality testing


    The project MUST have a general policy (formal or not) that as major new functionality is added to the software produced by the project, tests of that functionality should be added to an automated test suite. [test_policy]

    All new functionality, which is not provided by the framework being used, will be added to the automated test. Code Style: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Java+code+style



    The project MUST have evidence that the test_policy for adding tests has been adhered to in the most recent major changes to the software produced by the project. [tests_are_added]

    All new and updated functionality is tested in autotest suite (above). New test functionality can be seen in JIRA and Gerrit. Unit test coverage can be verified using Sonar

    https://jenkins.o-ran-sc.org/view/oam-tr069-adapter/job/oam-tr069-adapter-sonar/



    It is SUGGESTED that this policy on adding tests (see test_policy) be documented in the instructions for change proposals. [tests_documented_added]

    Only informal rule exists, tests are continuously added in practice All contributions should include tests, as described at OAM: Code Style: https://wiki.o-ran-sc.org/display/OAM/Code+Style


  • Warning flags


    The project MUST enable one or more compiler warning flags, a "safe" language mode, or use a separate "linter" tool to look for code quality errors or common simple mistakes, if there is at least one FLOSS tool that can implement this criterion in the selected language. [warnings]

    Sonar is used in development environment and automatically triggered by Jenkins during CI/CD process

    Jenkins: https://jenkins.o-ran-sc.org/view/oam-tr069-adapter/job/oam-tr069-adapter-sonar/

    CheckStyle & Findbugs are used in development environments



    The project MUST address warnings. [warnings_fixed]

    Sonar reports are acted upon continuously.



    It is SUGGESTED that projects be maximally strict with warnings in the software produced by the project, where practical. [warnings_strict]

    Taken on a case by case basis.

    All Checkstyle, Findbugs, test failures, notified issues/bugs and Sonar warnings gets addressed.

    Such issues are tracked using Jira.


  • Secure development knowledge


    The project MUST have at least one primary developer who knows how to design secure software. (See ‘details’ for the exact requirements.) [know_secure_design]


    At least one of the project's primary developers MUST know of common kinds of errors that lead to vulnerabilities in this kind of software, as well as at least one method to counter or mitigate each of them. [know_common_errors]

  • Use basic good cryptographic practices

    Note that some software does not need to use cryptographic mechanisms. If your project produces software that (1) includes, activates, or enables encryption functionality, and (2) might be released from the United States (US) to outside the US or to a non-US-citizen, you may be legally required to take a few extra steps. Typically this just involves sending an email. For more information, see the encryption section of Understanding Open Source Technology & US Export Controls.

    The software produced by the project MUST use, by default, only cryptographic protocols and algorithms that are publicly published and reviewed by experts (if cryptographic protocols and algorithms are used). [crypto_published]


    If the software produced by the project is an application or library, and its primary purpose is not to implement cryptography, then it SHOULD only call on software specifically designed to implement cryptographic functions; it SHOULD NOT re-implement its own. [crypto_call]

    Existing open-source cryptographic libraries are used.



    All functionality in the software produced by the project that depends on cryptography MUST be implementable using FLOSS. [crypto_floss]

    Existing open-source cryptographic libraries are used.



    The security mechanisms within the software produced by the project MUST use default keylengths that at least meet the NIST minimum requirements through the year 2030 (as stated in 2012). It MUST be possible to configure the software so that smaller keylengths are completely disabled. [crypto_keylength]

    No keys intended for production use are included. Keys needed for TLS needs to be provided at SW installation. There is no inbuilt limitations on key length etc.



    The default security mechanisms within the software produced by the project MUST NOT depend on broken cryptographic algorithms (e.g., MD4, MD5, single DES, RC4, Dual_EC_DRBG), or use cipher modes that are inappropriate to the context, unless they are necessary to implement an interoperable protocol (where the protocol implemented is the most recent version of that standard broadly supported by the network ecosystem, that ecosystem requires the use of such an algorithm or mode, and that ecosystem does not offer any more secure alternative). The documentation MUST describe any relevant security risks and any known mitigations if these broken algorithms or modes are necessary for an interoperable protocol. [crypto_working]

    Sample keys are RSA keys, and stored in a Java keystore file (PKCS12), which is encrypted by a password. It is the responsibility of the production user to ensure their keys are compliant.



    The default security mechanisms within the software produced by the project SHOULD NOT depend on cryptographic algorithms or modes with known serious weaknesses (e.g., the SHA-1 cryptographic hash algorithm or the CBC mode in SSH). [crypto_weaknesses]

    External cert servers are used - it is the responsibility of the software deployment entity to ensure security in this regards.



    The security mechanisms within the software produced by the project SHOULD implement perfect forward secrecy for key agreement protocols so a session key derived from a set of long-term keys cannot be compromised if one of the long-term keys is compromised in the future. [crypto_pfs]

    According to O-RAN Alliance and its Security Task Group the protocols TLS/HTTPS, TLS/NETCONF and FTSes are used for all SMO external interfaces.



    If the software produced by the project causes the storing of passwords for authentication of external users, the passwords MUST be stored as iterated hashes with a per-user salt by using a key stretching (iterated) algorithm (e.g., Argon2id, Bcrypt, Scrypt, or PBKDF2). See also OWASP Password Storage Cheat Sheet. [crypto_password_storage]

    An external identity server is used - the authentication happens externally to the produced software.



    The security mechanisms within the software produced by the project MUST generate all cryptographic keys and nonces using a cryptographically secure random number generator, and MUST NOT do so using generators that are cryptographically insecure. [crypto_random]

    According to O-RAN Alliance and its Security Task Group the protocols TLS/HTTPS, TLS/NETCONF and FTSes are used for all SMO external interfaces.


  • Secured delivery against man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks


    The project MUST use a delivery mechanism that counters MITM attacks. Using https or ssh+scp is acceptable. [delivery_mitm]

    According to O-RAN Alliance and its Security Task Group the protocols TLS/HTTPS, TLS/NETCONF and FTSes are used for all SMO external interfaces.



    A cryptographic hash (e.g., a sha1sum) MUST NOT be retrieved over http and used without checking for a cryptographic signature. [delivery_unsigned]

    According to O-RAN Alliance and its Security Task Group the protocols TLS/HTTPS, TLS/NETCONF and FTSes are used - Java, Jetty, Netty, Springboot.


  • Publicly known vulnerabilities fixed


    There MUST be no unpatched vulnerabilities of medium or higher severity that have been publicly known for more than 60 days. [vulnerabilities_fixed_60_days]

    LF is currently enabling scans across all projects. All high/med vulnerabilities, once identified, are fixed with highest priority (<60 days)



    Projects SHOULD fix all critical vulnerabilities rapidly after they are reported. [vulnerabilities_critical_fixed]

    All high/med vulnerabilities, once identified, are fixed with highest priority (<60 days)


  • Other security issues


    The public repositories MUST NOT leak a valid private credential (e.g., a working password or private key) that is intended to limit public access. [no_leaked_credentials]

    All sample/provided credentials are for test/demo purposes only.


  • Static code analysis


    At least one static code analysis tool (beyond compiler warnings and "safe" language modes) MUST be applied to any proposed major production release of the software before its release, if there is at least one FLOSS tool that implements this criterion in the selected language. [static_analysis]

    Sonar is used in development environment and automatically triggered by Jenkins during CI/CD process

    Jenkins: https://jenkins.o-ran-sc.org/view/oam-tr069-adapter/job/oam-tr069-adapter-sonar/

    Findbugs and Checkstyle is used in development environment NexusIQ (from Sonatype) is also used - focuses on license scan and performs a CVE scan based on versions used. A per-release license scan based is performed for LF Legal - uses a LF-internal scanning.



    It is SUGGESTED that at least one of the static analysis tools used for the static_analysis criterion include rules or approaches to look for common vulnerabilities in the analyzed language or environment. [static_analysis_common_vulnerabilities]

    Sonar is used in development environment and automatically triggered by Jenkins during CI/CD process

    Jenkins: https://jenkins.o-ran-sc.org/view/oam/job/oam-sonar/

    Findbugs and Checkstyle is used in development environments NexusIQ (from Sonatype) is also used - focuses on license scan and performs a CVE scan based on versions used. A per-release license scan based is performed for LF Legal - uses a LF-internal scanning.



    All medium and higher severity exploitable vulnerabilities discovered with static code analysis MUST be fixed in a timely way after they are confirmed. [static_analysis_fixed]

    All issues detected are converted into the JIRA of the project.



    It is SUGGESTED that static source code analysis occur on every commit or at least daily. [static_analysis_often]

  • Dynamic code analysis


    It is SUGGESTED that at least one dynamic analysis tool be applied to any proposed major production release of the software before its release. [dynamic_analysis]


    It is SUGGESTED that if the software produced by the project includes software written using a memory-unsafe language (e.g., C or C++), then at least one dynamic tool (e.g., a fuzzer or web application scanner) be routinely used in combination with a mechanism to detect memory safety problems such as buffer overwrites. If the project does not produce software written in a memory-unsafe language, choose "not applicable" (N/A). [dynamic_analysis_unsafe]

    Our project is written in memory-safe languages (Java and Python)



    It is SUGGESTED that the project use a configuration for at least some dynamic analysis (such as testing or fuzzing) which enables many assertions. In many cases these assertions should not be enabled in production builds. [dynamic_analysis_enable_assertions]


    All medium and higher severity exploitable vulnerabilities discovered with dynamic code analysis MUST be fixed in a timely way after they are confirmed. [dynamic_analysis_fixed]

    No exploitable vulnerabilities to our knowledge. Not running dynamic code analysis and thus have not found any vulnerabilities in this way



This data is available under the Creative Commons Attribution version 3.0 or later license (CC-BY-3.0+). All are free to share and adapt the data, but must give appropriate credit. Please credit Trishan de Lanerolle and the OpenSSF Best Practices badge contributors.

Project badge entry owned by: Trishan de Lanerolle.
Entry created on 2021-02-17 04:28:14 UTC, last updated on 2021-05-30 08:13:31 UTC. Last achieved passing badge on 2021-05-30 08:13:31 UTC.

Back