athenz

Projects that follow the best practices below can voluntarily self-certify and show that they've achieved an Open Source Security Foundation (OpenSSF) best practices badge.

If this is your project, please show your badge status on your project page! The badge status looks like this: Badge level for project 4681 is passing Here is how to embed it:

These are the Passing level criteria. You can also view the Silver or Gold level criteria.

        

 Basics 13/13

  • Identification

    Open source platform for X.509 certificate based service authentication and fine grained access control in dynamic infrastructures. Athenz supports provisioning and configuration (centralized authorization) use cases as well as serving/runtime (decentralized authorization) use cases.

    What programming language(s) are used to implement the project?
  • Basic project website content


    The project website MUST succinctly describe what the software does (what problem does it solve?). [description_good]

    https://www.athenz.io/ project website describes what the product is about. It further links to detailed user documentation, APIs, and where to get support and further information.



    The project website MUST provide information on how to: obtain, provide feedback (as bug reports or enhancements), and contribute to the software. [interact]

    La información sobre cómo contribuir DEBE explicar el proceso de contribución (por ejemplo, ¿se utilizan "pull requests" en el proyecto?) (URL required) [contribution]

    Non-trivial contribution file in repository: https://github.com/AthenZ/athenz/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md.



    The information on how to contribute SHOULD include the requirements for acceptable contributions (e.g., a reference to any required coding standard). (URL required) [contribution_requirements]
  • FLOSS license

    What license(s) is the project released under?



    The software produced by the project MUST be released as FLOSS. [floss_license]

    The Apache-2.0 license is approved by the Open Source Initiative (OSI).



    It is SUGGESTED that any required license(s) for the software produced by the project be approved by the Open Source Initiative (OSI). [floss_license_osi]

    The Apache-2.0 license is approved by the Open Source Initiative (OSI).



    The project MUST post the license(s) of its results in a standard location in their source repository. (URL required) [license_location]

    Non-trivial license location file in repository: https://github.com/AthenZ/athenz/blob/master/LICENSE.


  • Documentation


    The project MUST provide basic documentation for the software produced by the project. [documentation_basics]

    Detailed documentation is available at https://athenz.github.io/athenz/ linked from the main site.



    The project MUST provide reference documentation that describes the external interface (both input and output) of the software produced by the project. [documentation_interface]
  • Other


    The project sites (website, repository, and download URLs) MUST support HTTPS using TLS. [sites_https]

    Given only https: URLs. https://athenz.io



    The project MUST have one or more mechanisms for discussion (including proposed changes and issues) that are searchable, allow messages and topics to be addressed by URL, enable new people to participate in some of the discussions, and do not require client-side installation of proprietary software. [discussion]

    GitHub supports discussions on issues and pull requests.



    The project SHOULD provide documentation in English and be able to accept bug reports and comments about code in English. [english]

    https://athenz.github.io/athenz/ https://www.athenz.io/casestudies.html#hybrid Documentation & website are available in English



    The project MUST be maintained. [maintained]

    Project is actively maintained and contributed to. Live stats can be found at https://athenz.devstats.cncf.io/d/8/dashboards?orgId=1&refresh=15m



(Advanced) What other users have additional rights to edit this badge entry? Currently: []



  • Repositorio público para el control de versiones de código fuente


    El proyecto DEBE tener un repositorio público para el control de versiones de código fuente que sea legible públicamente y tenga URL. [repo_public]

    Repository on GitHub, which provides public git repositories with URLs. https://github.com/AthenZ



    El repositorio fuente del proyecto DEBE rastrear qué cambios se realizaron, quién realizó los cambios y cuándo se realizaron los cambios. [repo_track]

    Repository on GitHub, which uses git. git can track the changes, who made them, and when they were made.



    To enable collaborative review, the project's source repository MUST include interim versions for review between releases; it MUST NOT include only final releases. [repo_interim]

    Reviews are done via GitHub Pull Requests



    It is SUGGESTED that common distributed version control software be used (e.g., git) for the project's source repository. [repo_distributed]

    Repository on GitHub, which uses git. git is distributed.


  • Numeración única de versión


    The project results MUST have a unique version identifier for each release intended to be used by users. [version_unique]

    Project releases happen via Git tags https://github.com/AthenZ/athenz/tags & all the relevant artifacts are available on Maven Central.



    It is SUGGESTED that the Semantic Versioning (SemVer) or Calendar Versioning (CalVer) version numbering format be used for releases. It is SUGGESTED that those who use CalVer include a micro level value. [version_semver]


    It is SUGGESTED that projects identify each release within their version control system. For example, it is SUGGESTED that those using git identify each release using git tags. [version_tags]
  • Notas de lanzamiento


    The project MUST provide, in each release, release notes that are a human-readable summary of major changes in that release to help users determine if they should upgrade and what the upgrade impact will be. The release notes MUST NOT be the raw output of a version control log (e.g., the "git log" command results are not release notes). Projects whose results are not intended for reuse in multiple locations (such as the software for a single website or service) AND employ continuous delivery MAY select "N/A". (URL required) [release_notes]

    GitHub release tags include human readable release notes - e.g https://github.com/AthenZ/athenz/releases/tag/v1.10.8



    The release notes MUST identify every publicly known run-time vulnerability fixed in this release that already had a CVE assignment or similar when the release was created. This criterion may be marked as not applicable (N/A) if users typically cannot practically update the software themselves (e.g., as is often true for kernel updates). This criterion applies only to the project results, not to its dependencies. If there are no release notes or there have been no publicly known vulnerabilities, choose N/A. [release_notes_vulns]

    Releases have link to individual pull requests which also include CVE fixes etc. e.g https://github.com/AthenZ/athenz/releases/tag/v1.10.8 We don't typically call out each vulnerability which gets fixed by dependency upgrade.


  • Bug-reporting process


    The project MUST provide a process for users to submit bug reports (e.g., using an issue tracker or a mailing list). (URL required) [report_process]

    Project uses GitHub issues to track bug reports https://github.com/AthenZ/athenz/issues



    The project SHOULD use an issue tracker for tracking individual issues. [report_tracker]

    The project MUST acknowledge a majority of bug reports submitted in the last 2-12 months (inclusive); the response need not include a fix. [report_responses]

    Activity on GitHub issues https://github.com/AthenZ/athenz/issues



    The project SHOULD respond to a majority (>50%) of enhancement requests in the last 2-12 months (inclusive). [enhancement_responses]

    All the feature and / or enhancement requests are tracked via github issues https://github.com/AthenZ/athenz/issues



    El proyecto DEBE tener un archivo públicamente disponible para informes y respuestas para búsquedas posteriores. (URL required) [report_archive]
  • Proceso de informe de vulnerabilidad


    The project MUST publish the process for reporting vulnerabilities on the project site. (URL required) [vulnerability_report_process]

    If private vulnerability reports are supported, the project MUST include how to send the information in a way that is kept private. (URL required) [vulnerability_report_private]

    https://github.com/AthenZ/athenz/security/policy mentions an email address to submit vulnerability reports.



    The project's initial response time for any vulnerability report received in the last 6 months MUST be less than or equal to 14 days. [vulnerability_report_response]

    Maintainers strictly follow the security policy mentioned at https://github.com/AthenZ/athenz/security/policy


  • Working build system


    Si el software generado por el proyecto requiere ser construido para su uso, el proyecto DEBE proporcionar un sistema de compilación que pueda satisfactoriamente reconstruir automáticamente el software a partir del código fuente. [build]

    Non-trivial build file in repository: https://github.com/AthenZ/athenz/blob/master/pom.xml. Project can be built locally using Java and Maven and it has a CI/CD set up using another open source project - https://screwdriver.cd



    Se SUGIERE que se utilicen herramientas comunes para construir el software. [build_common_tools]

    Non-trivial build file in repository: https://github.com/AthenZ/athenz/blob/master/pom.xml. Project is built using Java, Maven, Go and Node.



    El proyecto DEBERÍA ser construible usando solo herramientas FLOSS. [build_floss_tools]

    Athenz is built using screwdriver.cd which is a CD Foundation project - https://screwdriver.cd/


  • Automated test suite


    The project MUST use at least one automated test suite that is publicly released as FLOSS (this test suite may be maintained as a separate FLOSS project). The project MUST clearly show or document how to run the test suite(s) (e.g., via a continuous integration (CI) script or via documentation in files such as BUILD.md, README.md, or CONTRIBUTING.md). [test]

    Unit tests are executed as part of the build.



    Un conjunto de pruebas DEBERÍA ser invocable de forma estándar para ese lenguaje. [test_invocation]

    Unit tests are executed as part of the build, using standard maven build process.



    It is SUGGESTED that the test suite cover most (or ideally all) the code branches, input fields, and functionality. [test_most]

    sub-module POMs enforce minimum required code coverage and PR builds will fail if the new code does not satisfy the conditions.



    It is SUGGESTED that the project implement continuous integration (where new or changed code is frequently integrated into a central code repository and automated tests are run on the result). [test_continuous_integration]

    Athenz main branch build is triggered on every merge and automated tests run in every build.


  • New functionality testing


    The project MUST have a general policy (formal or not) that as major new functionality is added to the software produced by the project, tests of that functionality should be added to an automated test suite. [test_policy]

    sub-module POMs enforce minimum required code coverage and PR builds will fail if the new code does not satisfy the conditions.



    The project MUST have evidence that the test_policy for adding tests has been adhered to in the most recent major changes to the software produced by the project. [tests_are_added]

    sub-module POMs enforce minimum required code coverage and PR builds will fail if the new code does not satisfy the conditions.



    It is SUGGESTED that this policy on adding tests (see test_policy) be documented in the instructions for change proposals. [tests_documented_added]

    sub-module POMs enforce minimum required code coverage and PR builds will fail if the new code does not satisfy the conditions.


  • Banderas de advertencia


    The project MUST enable one or more compiler warning flags, a "safe" language mode, or use a separate "linter" tool to look for code quality errors or common simple mistakes, if there is at least one FLOSS tool that can implement this criterion in the selected language. [warnings]

    Athenz uses checkstyle for java, native go linter for go and eslint for javascript modules.



    El proyecto DEBE abordar las advertencias. [warnings_fixed]

    Main maven build is set to fail on warnings.



    It is SUGGESTED that projects be maximally strict with warnings in the software produced by the project, where practical. [warnings_strict]

    Main maven build is set to fail on warnings.


  • Conocimiento de desarrollo seguro


    The project MUST have at least one primary developer who knows how to design secure software. (See ‘details’ for the exact requirements.) [know_secure_design]

    Athenz Project maintainers are well versed in Secure Software Development Practices. Primary contributors to the project are from Verizon Media and Yahoo! Japan with their own internal Security teams who evaluate the product periodically for any vulnerabilities since Athenz is used at enterprise scale within these organizations.



    At least one of the project's primary developers MUST know of common kinds of errors that lead to vulnerabilities in this kind of software, as well as at least one method to counter or mitigate each of them. [know_common_errors]

    Athenz Project maintainers are well versed in Secure Software Development Practices.


  • Use buenas prácticas criptográficas

    Note that some software does not need to use cryptographic mechanisms. If your project produces software that (1) includes, activates, or enables encryption functionality, and (2) might be released from the United States (US) to outside the US or to a non-US-citizen, you may be legally required to take a few extra steps. Typically this just involves sending an email. For more information, see the encryption section of Understanding Open Source Technology & US Export Controls.

    The software produced by the project MUST use, by default, only cryptographic protocols and algorithms that are publicly published and reviewed by experts (if cryptographic protocols and algorithms are used). [crypto_published]

    The Athenz project uses standard open-source implementations of cryptographic protocols and algorithms. Examples: Bouncy Castle https://www.bouncycastle.org/



    Si el software producido por el proyecto es una aplicación o una librería, y su propósito principal no es implementar criptografía, entonces DEBE SOLAMENTE invocar un software específicamente diseñado para implementar funciones criptográficas; NO DEBERÍA volver a implementar el suyo. [crypto_call]

    Athenz doesn't implement any cryptographic functions, rather it uses open source libraries like Bouncy Castle



    All functionality in the software produced by the project that depends on cryptography MUST be implementable using FLOSS. [crypto_floss]

    Athenz as well as its dependencies are fully FLOSS.



    The security mechanisms within the software produced by the project MUST use default keylengths that at least meet the NIST minimum requirements through the year 2030 (as stated in 2012). It MUST be possible to configure the software so that smaller keylengths are completely disabled. [crypto_keylength]

    Athenz relies on underlying cryptography libraries like OpenSSL and Bouncy Castle.



    The default security mechanisms within the software produced by the project MUST NOT depend on broken cryptographic algorithms (e.g., MD4, MD5, single DES, RC4, Dual_EC_DRBG), or use cipher modes that are inappropriate to the context, unless they are necessary to implement an interoperable protocol (where the protocol implemented is the most recent version of that standard broadly supported by the network ecosystem, that ecosystem requires the use of such an algorithm or mode, and that ecosystem does not offer any more secure alternative). The documentation MUST describe any relevant security risks and any known mitigations if these broken algorithms or modes are necessary for an interoperable protocol. [crypto_working]

    Athenz provides a fully configurable way to start its servers with recommended security configurations like included cipher suites, excluded cipher suites, excluded protocols etc. e.g. https://github.com/AthenZ/athenz/blob/master/servers/zts/conf/athenz.properties#L49-L64



    The default security mechanisms within the software produced by the project SHOULD NOT depend on cryptographic algorithms or modes with known serious weaknesses (e.g., the SHA-1 cryptographic hash algorithm or the CBC mode in SSH). [crypto_weaknesses]

    Athenz is not dependent on cryptographic algorithms or modes with known serious weaknesses like SHA-1



    The security mechanisms within the software produced by the project SHOULD implement perfect forward secrecy for key agreement protocols so a session key derived from a set of long-term keys cannot be compromised if one of the long-term keys is compromised in the future. [crypto_pfs]

    In all use-cases we use the default forward secrecy provided by 3rd-party open-source libraries for handling https, ssh etc.



    If the software produced by the project causes the storing of passwords for authentication of external users, the passwords MUST be stored as iterated hashes with a per-user salt by using a key stretching (iterated) algorithm (e.g., Argon2id, Bcrypt, Scrypt, or PBKDF2). See also OWASP Password Storage Cheat Sheet. [crypto_password_storage]

    Pipeline secrets in CICD use PBKDF2



    The security mechanisms within the software produced by the project MUST generate all cryptographic keys and nonces using a cryptographically secure random number generator, and MUST NOT do so using generators that are cryptographically insecure. [crypto_random]

    Athenz servers use Bouncy Castle which is a provider for the Java Cryptography Extension (JCE), Java Cryptography Architecture (JCA) and for the Java Secure Socket Extension (JSSE).


  • Entrega garantizada contra ataques de hombre en el medio (MITM)


    The project MUST use a delivery mechanism that counters MITM attacks. Using https or ssh+scp is acceptable. [delivery_mitm]

    Athenz uses https. Artifacts are signed before uploading to Maven Central.



    A cryptographic hash (e.g., a sha1sum) MUST NOT be retrieved over http and used without checking for a cryptographic signature. [delivery_unsigned]

    Athenz does not distribute hashes but rely on Maven Central for software distribution,


  • Vulnerabilidades públicamente conocidas corregidas


    There MUST be no unpatched vulnerabilities of medium or higher severity that have been publicly known for more than 60 days. [vulnerabilities_fixed_60_days]

    We don't have any existing unpatched vulnerabilities which are known publicly.we do actively look into reports and fixes from automated tools like Dependabot from Github and address vulnerabilities.



    Projects SHOULD fix all critical vulnerabilities rapidly after they are reported. [vulnerabilities_critical_fixed]

    Athenz maintainers actively looks into any vulnerability reports and strives to fix them in a timely manner


  • Otros problemas de seguridad


    The public repositories MUST NOT leak a valid private credential (e.g., a working password or private key) that is intended to limit public access. [no_leaked_credentials]

    No public repositories under AthenZ GitHub org have any leaked credentials https://github.com/AthenZ


  • Análisis estático de código


    At least one static code analysis tool (beyond compiler warnings and "safe" language modes) MUST be applied to any proposed major production release of the software before its release, if there is at least one FLOSS tool that implements this criterion in the selected language. [static_analysis]

    Athenz uses SonarCloud as well as GitHub Dependabot for SAST and SCA



    It is SUGGESTED that at least one of the static analysis tools used for the static_analysis criterion include rules or approaches to look for common vulnerabilities in the analyzed language or environment. [static_analysis_common_vulnerabilities]

    All medium and higher severity exploitable vulnerabilities discovered with static code analysis MUST be fixed in a timely way after they are confirmed. [static_analysis_fixed]

    Maintainers follow the SonarCloud report and fixing the medium and higher severity exploitable vulnerabilities



    It is SUGGESTED that static source code analysis occur on every commit or at least daily. [static_analysis_often]

    It will be integrated with CI build.


  • Dynamic code analysis


    It is SUGGESTED that at least one dynamic analysis tool be applied to any proposed major production release of the software before its release. [dynamic_analysis]

    We are working on onboarding to a dynamic analysis tool but Athenz is not using one today. Unit tests for individual sub-modules do have a good coverage with negative and boundary condition input testing.



    It is SUGGESTED that if the software produced by the project includes software written using a memory-unsafe language (e.g., C or C++), then at least one dynamic tool (e.g., a fuzzer or web application scanner) be routinely used in combination with a mechanism to detect memory safety problems such as buffer overwrites. If the project does not produce software written in a memory-unsafe language, choose "not applicable" (N/A). [dynamic_analysis_unsafe]

    Athenz uses Java, Go and JavaScript which are memory-safe languages.



    It is SUGGESTED that the project use a configuration for at least some dynamic analysis (such as testing or fuzzing) which enables many assertions. In many cases these assertions should not be enabled in production builds. [dynamic_analysis_enable_assertions]

    Athenz servers produce run-time events such as logs and metrics which are exposed to monitoring tools and can be used for dynamic analysis.



    All medium and higher severity exploitable vulnerabilities discovered with dynamic code analysis MUST be fixed in a timely way after they are confirmed. [dynamic_analysis_fixed]

    Athenz does not use DAST today.



This data is available under the Creative Commons Attribution version 3.0 or later license (CC-BY-3.0+). All are free to share and adapt the data, but must give appropriate credit. Please credit Abhijeet V and the OpenSSF Best Practices badge contributors.

Project badge entry owned by: Abhijeet V.
Entry created on 2021-03-03 21:19:15 UTC, last updated on 2021-07-11 00:02:58 UTC. Last achieved passing badge on 2021-07-10 23:11:26 UTC.

Back