Tekton Dashboard

Projects that follow the best practices below can voluntarily self-certify and show that they've achieved an Open Source Security Foundation (OpenSSF) best practices badge.

If this is your project, please show your badge status on your project page! The badge status looks like this: Badge level for project 6543 is passing Here is how to embed it:

These are the Passing level criteria. You can also view the Silver or Gold level criteria.

        

 Basics 13/13

  • Identification

    A dashboard for Tekton!

    What programming language(s) are used to implement the project?
  • Basic project website content


    The project website MUST succinctly describe what the software does (what problem does it solve?). [description_good]

    The project website MUST provide information on how to: obtain, provide feedback (as bug reports or enhancements), and contribute to the software. [interact]

    The information on how to contribute MUST explain the contribution process (e.g., are pull requests used?) (URL required) [contribution]

    Non-trivial contribution file in repository: https://github.com/tektoncd/dashboard/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md.



    The information on how to contribute SHOULD include the requirements for acceptable contributions (e.g., a reference to any required coding standard). (URL required) [contribution_requirements]
  • FLOSS license

    What license(s) is the project released under?



    The software produced by the project MUST be released as FLOSS. [floss_license]

    The Apache-2.0 license is approved by the Open Source Initiative (OSI).



    It is SUGGESTED that any required license(s) for the software produced by the project be approved by the Open Source Initiative (OSI). [floss_license_osi]

    The Apache-2.0 license is approved by the Open Source Initiative (OSI).



    The project MUST post the license(s) of its results in a standard location in their source repository. (URL required) [license_location]

    Non-trivial license location file in repository: https://github.com/tektoncd/dashboard/blob/main/LICENSE.


  • Documentation


    The project MUST provide basic documentation for the software produced by the project. [documentation_basics]

    Some documentation basics file contents found.



    The project MUST provide reference documentation that describes the external interface (both input and output) of the software produced by the project. [documentation_interface]

    The Dashboard API is documented at https://github.com/tektoncd/dashboard/blob/main/docs/dev/api.md, extension are documented in https://github.com/tektoncd/dashboard/blob/main/docs/extensions.md, and the getting started tutorial at https://github.com/tektoncd/dashboard/blob/main/docs/tutorial.md walks the user through the core functionality of the UI.


  • Other


    The project sites (website, repository, and download URLs) MUST support HTTPS using TLS. [sites_https]

    Given only https: URLs.



    The project MUST have one or more mechanisms for discussion (including proposed changes and issues) that are searchable, allow messages and topics to be addressed by URL, enable new people to participate in some of the discussions, and do not require client-side installation of proprietary software. [discussion]

    GitHub supports discussions on issues and pull requests.



    The project SHOULD provide documentation in English and be able to accept bug reports and comments about code in English. [english]

    The project MUST be maintained. [maintained]


(Advanced) What other users have additional rights to edit this badge entry? Currently: []



  • Public version-controlled source repository


    The project MUST have a version-controlled source repository that is publicly readable and has a URL. [repo_public]

    Repository on GitHub, which provides public git repositories with URLs.



    The project's source repository MUST track what changes were made, who made the changes, and when the changes were made. [repo_track]

    Repository on GitHub, which uses git. git can track the changes, who made them, and when they were made.



    To enable collaborative review, the project's source repository MUST include interim versions for review between releases; it MUST NOT include only final releases. [repo_interim]

    The project is hosted on git and uses a single branch main for development with GitHub pull request for changes. Nightly builds are also available at gs://tekton-releases-nightly/dashboard/previous (publicly accessible)



    It is SUGGESTED that common distributed version control software be used (e.g., git) for the project's source repository. [repo_distributed]

    Repository on GitHub, which uses git. git is distributed.


  • Unique version numbering


    The project results MUST have a unique version identifier for each release intended to be used by users. [version_unique]

    The projects uses semantic release numbers. Releases are available at https://github.com/tektoncd/dashboard/releases



    It is SUGGESTED that the Semantic Versioning (SemVer) or Calendar Versioning (CalVer) version numbering format be used for releases. It is SUGGESTED that those who use CalVer include a micro level value. [version_semver]


    It is SUGGESTED that projects identify each release within their version control system. For example, it is SUGGESTED that those using git identify each release using git tags. [version_tags]

    Each release is tagged in git


  • Release notes


    The project MUST provide, in each release, release notes that are a human-readable summary of major changes in that release to help users determine if they should upgrade and what the upgrade impact will be. The release notes MUST NOT be the raw output of a version control log (e.g., the "git log" command results are not release notes). Projects whose results are not intended for reuse in multiple locations (such as the software for a single website or service) AND employ continuous delivery MAY select "N/A". (URL required) [release_notes]

    Release notes are produced automatically from release note comments included in relevant PRs, which result in the release notes published at https://github.com/tektoncd/dashboard/releases



    The release notes MUST identify every publicly known run-time vulnerability fixed in this release that already had a CVE assignment or similar when the release was created. This criterion may be marked as not applicable (N/A) if users typically cannot practically update the software themselves (e.g., as is often true for kernel updates). This criterion applies only to the project results, not to its dependencies. If there are no release notes or there have been no publicly known vulnerabilities, choose N/A. [release_notes_vulns]
  • Bug-reporting process


    The project MUST provide a process for users to submit bug reports (e.g., using an issue tracker or a mailing list). (URL required) [report_process]

    The project SHOULD use an issue tracker for tracking individual issues. [report_tracker]

    The project MUST acknowledge a majority of bug reports submitted in the last 2-12 months (inclusive); the response need not include a fix. [report_responses]

    The project reviews issues on a regular basis. It also uses a bot to automatically make issues as "rotten" and "closed" when they are not modified for a certain amount of time. Issues that should not "rot" are marked as "frozen" and thus acknowledged as relevant to the project.



    The project SHOULD respond to a majority (>50%) of enhancement requests in the last 2-12 months (inclusive). [enhancement_responses]

    The project reviews issues on a regular basis. It also uses a bot to automatically make issues as "rotten" and "closed" when they are not modified for a certain amount of time. Issues that should not "rot" are marked as "frozen" and thus acknowledged as relevant to the project.



    The project MUST have a publicly available archive for reports and responses for later searching. (URL required) [report_archive]
  • Vulnerability report process


    The project MUST publish the process for reporting vulnerabilities on the project site. (URL required) [vulnerability_report_process]

    If private vulnerability reports are supported, the project MUST include how to send the information in a way that is kept private. (URL required) [vulnerability_report_private]

    The project's initial response time for any vulnerability report received in the last 6 months MUST be less than or equal to 14 days. [vulnerability_report_response]
  • Working build system


    If the software produced by the project requires building for use, the project MUST provide a working build system that can automatically rebuild the software from source code. [build]

    Nightly builds are provided. Software builds are automated. Documentation on how to build the software is available at https://github.com/tektoncd/dashboard/tree/main/docs/dev



    It is SUGGESTED that common tools be used for building the software. [build_common_tools]

    The backend (golang) is built using ko (github.com/build-ko/ko) which is a common tool in the golang + containers ecosystem. The frontend (JavaScript) is built using webpack (https://webpack.js.org/) and babel (https://babeljs.io/) which are common tools in the JavaScript ecosystem.



    The project SHOULD be buildable using only FLOSS tools. [build_floss_tools]

    Only FLOSS tools are used by dashboard


  • Automated test suite


    The project MUST use at least one automated test suite that is publicly released as FLOSS (this test suite may be maintained as a separate FLOSS project). The project MUST clearly show or document how to run the test suite(s) (e.g., via a continuous integration (CI) script or via documentation in files such as BUILD.md, README.md, or CONTRIBUTING.md). [test]

    A test suite SHOULD be invocable in a standard way for that language. [test_invocation]

    Backend tests are executed via "go test" Frontend tests are executed via "npm test" for unit tests, and "npm run e2e" for browser-based end-user tests



    It is SUGGESTED that the test suite cover most (or ideally all) the code branches, input fields, and functionality. [test_most]

    UI components and supporting code are unit tested in isolation to >90% coverage. Integration tests provide additional coverage for the flow of data through the application including simulating error cases at the data / network layers. Browser-based end user tests verify the complete end-to-end flow including install and configuration of the application.



    It is SUGGESTED that the project implement continuous integration (where new or changed code is frequently integrated into a central code repository and automated tests are run on the result). [test_continuous_integration]

    CI is implemented via prow tests running on every PR before it's merged


  • New functionality testing


    The project MUST have a general policy (formal or not) that as major new functionality is added to the software produced by the project, tests of that functionality should be added to an automated test suite. [test_policy]

    Community wide policy linked to from the dashboard docs https://github.com/tektoncd/community/blob/main/standards.md#tests



    The project MUST have evidence that the test_policy for adding tests has been adhered to in the most recent major changes to the software produced by the project. [tests_are_added]

    Pull requests can be used as evidence: https://github.com/tektoncd/dashboard/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aclosed When test coverage is missing for new features or functionality it is requested by reviewers.



    It is SUGGESTED that this policy on adding tests (see test_policy) be documented in the instructions for change proposals. [tests_documented_added]
  • Warning flags


    The project MUST enable one or more compiler warning flags, a "safe" language mode, or use a separate "linter" tool to look for code quality errors or common simple mistakes, if there is at least one FLOSS tool that can implement this criterion in the selected language. [warnings]

    The project MUST address warnings. [warnings_fixed]

    Linters are run on PR presubmit checks and will fail and prevent merging if linter warnings are found.



    It is SUGGESTED that projects be maximally strict with warnings in the software produced by the project, where practical. [warnings_strict]

    We enable as many checks as practical and regularly review these including when updating tooling / dependencies. Our eslint config is based on the commonly used eslint-config-airbnb with some warnings related to code formatting or stylistic choices disabled and is regularly reviewed. Currently enabled golanci-lint checks are defined in https://github.com/tektoncd/dashboard/blob/f0eba40a278c7c0c25bcf2e614e36434c20f131a/.golangci.yml#L7-L17


  • Secure development knowledge


    The project MUST have at least one primary developer who knows how to design secure software. (See ‘details’ for the exact requirements.) [know_secure_design]

    Tekton Tekton Vulnerability Management team tekton-vmt[at]googlegroups.com



    At least one of the project's primary developers MUST know of common kinds of errors that lead to vulnerabilities in this kind of software, as well as at least one method to counter or mitigate each of them. [know_common_errors]

    Tekton Tekton Vulnerability Management team tekton-vmt[at]googlegroups.com


  • Use basic good cryptographic practices

    Note that some software does not need to use cryptographic mechanisms. If your project produces software that (1) includes, activates, or enables encryption functionality, and (2) might be released from the United States (US) to outside the US or to a non-US-citizen, you may be legally required to take a few extra steps. Typically this just involves sending an email. For more information, see the encryption section of Understanding Open Source Technology & US Export Controls.

    The software produced by the project MUST use, by default, only cryptographic protocols and algorithms that are publicly published and reviewed by experts (if cryptographic protocols and algorithms are used). [crypto_published]


    If the software produced by the project is an application or library, and its primary purpose is not to implement cryptography, then it SHOULD only call on software specifically designed to implement cryptographic functions; it SHOULD NOT re-implement its own. [crypto_call]

    Tekton pipeline does not implement any cryptographic function. It relies on libraries and external tools for that.



    All functionality in the software produced by the project that depends on cryptography MUST be implementable using FLOSS. [crypto_floss]

    Tekton does not have any non-FLOSS dependency.



    The security mechanisms within the software produced by the project MUST use default keylengths that at least meet the NIST minimum requirements through the year 2030 (as stated in 2012). It MUST be possible to configure the software so that smaller keylengths are completely disabled. [crypto_keylength]


    The default security mechanisms within the software produced by the project MUST NOT depend on broken cryptographic algorithms (e.g., MD4, MD5, single DES, RC4, Dual_EC_DRBG), or use cipher modes that are inappropriate to the context, unless they are necessary to implement an interoperable protocol (where the protocol implemented is the most recent version of that standard broadly supported by the network ecosystem, that ecosystem requires the use of such an algorithm or mode, and that ecosystem does not offer any more secure alternative). The documentation MUST describe any relevant security risks and any known mitigations if these broken algorithms or modes are necessary for an interoperable protocol. [crypto_working]


    The default security mechanisms within the software produced by the project SHOULD NOT depend on cryptographic algorithms or modes with known serious weaknesses (e.g., the SHA-1 cryptographic hash algorithm or the CBC mode in SSH). [crypto_weaknesses]

    Tekton does not expose any SSH service. The default TLS support does not depend on SHA-1 or CBC algorithms.



    The security mechanisms within the software produced by the project SHOULD implement perfect forward secrecy for key agreement protocols so a session key derived from a set of long-term keys cannot be compromised if one of the long-term keys is compromised in the future. [crypto_pfs]

    Tekton Dashboard does not serve any long term key to users.



    If the software produced by the project causes the storing of passwords for authentication of external users, the passwords MUST be stored as iterated hashes with a per-user salt by using a key stretching (iterated) algorithm (e.g., Argon2id, Bcrypt, Scrypt, or PBKDF2). See also OWASP Password Storage Cheat Sheet. [crypto_password_storage]

    Tekton Dashboard does not store user passwords for authentication of external users.



    The security mechanisms within the software produced by the project MUST generate all cryptographic keys and nonces using a cryptographically secure random number generator, and MUST NOT do so using generators that are cryptographically insecure. [crypto_random]

  • Secured delivery against man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks


    The project MUST use a delivery mechanism that counters MITM attacks. Using https or ssh+scp is acceptable. [delivery_mitm]

    Container images in Tekton releases are digitally signed using Sigstore (https://sigstore.dev). Tekton manifests are downloaded over HTTPS or secure object storage protocol. Attestations are stored along with the container images and in the Rekor transparency log.



    A cryptographic hash (e.g., a sha1sum) MUST NOT be retrieved over http and used without checking for a cryptographic signature. [delivery_unsigned]

    We do not use plain HTTP


  • Publicly known vulnerabilities fixed


    There MUST be no unpatched vulnerabilities of medium or higher severity that have been publicly known for more than 60 days. [vulnerabilities_fixed_60_days]

    Tekton has a vulnerability team that is responsible for answering to vulnerability reports within 3 working days: https://github.com/tektoncd/dashboard/security/policy. If the issue is confirmed as a vulnerability, we will open a Security Advisory. This project follows a 90 day disclosure timeline which gives ample time to provide fixes, documentation and/or mitigations for the issue before it's disclosed and before the extra 60 days of this requirement (150 days overall).

    For vulnerabilities in Tekton Dashboard dependencies, we use a combination of dependabot, the Tekton vulnerability mailing list and the maintainer expertise to discover them and address them as soon as possible.



    Projects SHOULD fix all critical vulnerabilities rapidly after they are reported. [vulnerabilities_critical_fixed]

    Tekton has a vulnerability team that is responsible for answering to vulnerability reports within 3 working days: https://github.com/tektoncd/dashboard/security/policy We also run dependabot so that we are notified about vulnerabilities in our dependencies and can address them promptly.


  • Other security issues


    The public repositories MUST NOT leak a valid private credential (e.g., a working password or private key) that is intended to limit public access. [no_leaked_credentials]

    Credentials used by Tekton CI/CD processes are stored exclusively on a private Kubernetes cluster and never in git. Tekton is designed to make use of Kubernetes secrets via a mechanism called "workspaces".


  • Static code analysis


    At least one static code analysis tool (beyond compiler warnings and "safe" language modes) MUST be applied to any proposed major production release of the software before its release, if there is at least one FLOSS tool that implements this criterion in the selected language. [static_analysis]

    CodeQL Analysis is executed against all pull requests: https://github.com/tektoncd/dashboard/blob/main/.github/workflows/codeql-analysis.yml



    It is SUGGESTED that at least one of the static analysis tools used for the static_analysis criterion include rules or approaches to look for common vulnerabilities in the analyzed language or environment. [static_analysis_common_vulnerabilities]

    CodeQL Analysis is executed against all pull requests: https://github.com/tektoncd/dashboard/blob/main/.github/workflows/codeql-analysis.yml



    All medium and higher severity exploitable vulnerabilities discovered with static code analysis MUST be fixed in a timely way after they are confirmed. [static_analysis_fixed]

    We have a security policy in place https://github.com/tektoncd/dashboard/security/policy We have enabled CodeQL and Dependabot.



    It is SUGGESTED that static source code analysis occur on every commit or at least daily. [static_analysis_often]

    CodeQL Analysis is executed against all pull requests: https://github.com/tektoncd/dashboard/blob/main/.github/workflows/codeql-analysis.yml


  • Dynamic code analysis


    It is SUGGESTED that at least one dynamic analysis tool be applied to any proposed major production release of the software before its release. [dynamic_analysis]

    Some fuzzing testing was performed as part of Tekton security audit. We may run fuzzing on a regular basis in future.



    It is SUGGESTED that if the software produced by the project includes software written using a memory-unsafe language (e.g., C or C++), then at least one dynamic tool (e.g., a fuzzer or web application scanner) be routinely used in combination with a mechanism to detect memory safety problems such as buffer overwrites. If the project does not produce software written in a memory-unsafe language, choose "not applicable" (N/A). [dynamic_analysis_unsafe]

    Tekton Dashboard is written in JavaScript and golang.



    It is SUGGESTED that the project use a configuration for at least some dynamic analysis (such as testing or fuzzing) which enables many assertions. In many cases these assertions should not be enabled in production builds. [dynamic_analysis_enable_assertions]

    We do not run fuzzing tests yet.



    All medium and higher severity exploitable vulnerabilities discovered with dynamic code analysis MUST be fixed in a timely way after they are confirmed. [dynamic_analysis_fixed]

    We do not run fuzzing tests yet.



This data is available under the Creative Commons Attribution version 3.0 or later license (CC-BY-3.0+). All are free to share and adapt the data, but must give appropriate credit. Please credit Andrea Frittoli and the OpenSSF Best Practices badge contributors.

Project badge entry owned by: Andrea Frittoli.
Entry created on 2022-10-02 11:28:22 UTC, last updated on 2024-01-11 15:44:17 UTC. Last achieved passing badge on 2022-10-04 16:06:55 UTC.

Back